SCREEN-L Archives

July 2004, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:20:10 -0700
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Subject:
From:
Lisa Kernan <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-disposition:
inline
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
According to Vincent Canby's intro to the NYT Film Reviews set, reporters
"wrote in anonymity" until Oct. 6, 1924 when Mordaunt Hall received the
first byline. If you haven't seen it, his intro (in the vol. that begins in
1913) has other interesting things to say about attribution...
Cheers,
Lisa



--On Tuesday, July 27, 2004 3:15 PM -0500 Dana Polan
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I am trying to identify who the reviewer of movies for the NYT in 1921
> would have been.  In particular, I am interested in the reviewer for a 25
> December piece on MISS LULU BETTS.
>
> Thanks!
>
> ----
> To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
> in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]



----------------------
Dr. Lisa D. Kernan
Arts Librarian for Film, Television and Theater
UCLA Arts Library
310-206-4823
[log in to unmask]

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2