SCREEN-L Archives

September 2001, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 16:53:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
>Hmm, there are some thorny ethical questions here

Why would this be an ethical issue?  Whoever owns the rights authorized
this so it's completely legit; even if the original is altered or not
preserved that's more a historical question.  Even the European concept of
moral rights is despite the name a legal issue not ethical.

Also, if the discussion was about the Criterion Hitchcock films then the
soundtrack was not rerecorded:  These have the original soundtrack which
has been digitally restored/remastered.  An example of partial soundtrack
re-recording would be the restoration (or maybe "restoration") of
"Vertigo" which had newly recorded sound effects.

==============

whatever the "legal" issues, the question of whether one has the "right"
to
alter or "improve" a historical document is surely an ethical one, no
matter
how one chooses to answer it

----
Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
http://www.tcf.ua.edu/ScreenSite

----
Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
http://www.tcf.ua.edu/ScreenSite

ATOM RSS1 RSS2