Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 02:56:31 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Comments: |
RFC822 error: <W> MESSAGE-ID field duplicated. Last occurrence
was retained. |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Evan Rosenfield wrote:
>
>Isn't an evil hero impossible?
If we define a hero as being the character with whom the film-maker(s)
intends the viewer to most readily empathise with, then a lot of Fritz
Lang's films explore this issue, albeit with similar parameters in mind.
Three which come readily to mind are...
Part 2 of DIE NIEBELUNGEN in which Kriemhild gets up to some pretty nasty
tricks,, most of which she justifies as avenging Siegfried's murder... (cf.
the recent 'evil women' thread)
M - could the paedophile murderer be regarded as a 'hero' (in the context
of the film's narrative) on the grounds that he is apprehended by a gang of
organised criminals? Most cinemagoers (even in late-Weimar Germany) would
surely prefer the rule of law (which is shown, in the form of the police
inspector, as being somewhat incapable of ruling) over the rule of
self-appointed vigilantes, who are also criminals? Could it be said that
the Peter Lorre character is depicted as a hero on the basis of who he is
up against?
BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT - we don't want the Dana Andrews character to be
executed despite the fact that he quite clearly murdered his ex-wife.
-------------------------------------
Leo Enticknap
Flat 3, 36 Clifton
York YO30 6AW
Tel. 01904 673207 (home); 0410 417383 (mobile)
----
Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
http://www.tcf.ua.edu/ScreenSite
|
|
|