LISTSERV - LISTSERV.UA.EDU
SCREEN-L
Film and TV Studies Discussion List
Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
SCREEN-L Home SCREEN-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Re: Pulp Fiction - response

James Tichenor <[log in to unmask]>
Sun, 13 Nov 1994 16:42:40 CST
text/plain (52 lines)
Show Text Part by Default | Print
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 
 
 
>To pass on what Tarantino himself said about the scene, I paraphrase an
>article on him from either Los Angeles Magazine or Entertainment Weekly.  He
>said that he believed that any word that held such power as what you
>referred to as the 'N' word (I cringe at violating your hypersensitivities)
>should be shouted from the rooftops until it has lost that power.
>
 
Ah ha! I knew he meant it. He's a smart cookie. For a film that is labelled
as violent, how much violence is really in it? As far as I can remember,
3 killings, an anal rape and a mutilation. Not a record breaker. It's
"violent" and "racist", because QT uses these ideas and stretches them,
drawing them out, dwelling on them, not just "blowing a kids head off"
and moving on to the next act. That one act of violence drove a 30 minute
story. I tell you, he knows exactly what he's doing. Thanks for the quote.
 
 
>I find reactionist tactics such as condemning a filmmaker as racist for
>overusing a naughty word disgusting.  Look at what you have said.  Have you
>examined the man before condemning him?  Or have you just reacted to
>something that was obviously there to provoke a reaction in the first place?
> Viewing Tarantino's great relationship with Jackson off-screen and the
>comments he has made regarding his agendas, it seems quite inaccurate to
>label him a racist.  Rather, he is trying to stir up his audience and force
>them to deal with these issues _in themselves_.    He has pushed your
>buttons, and you reacted just like he probably expected.  If you have a
>problem with that scene, maybe you should look at your own values before you
>judge his.   I think this is his goal.
 
Agreed and thank you for saying so much better than I would have be able to.
 
Fhew. Thought I was a racist there for a moment.
 
 
>
>Another point:  Jackson's character is the only one in the film to have any
>redeemable moral value, and racism was never an issue in inter-character
>relationships.  They seem to have no trouble getting along (Jackson and
>Travolta, the eventual reconciliation of Marcellus and Willis, Marcellus and
>Travolta, Marcellus and Thurman, Marcellus and Keitel, Jackson and
>Tarantino)
 
All good examples. I might be convinced that the only stereotyped (racist)
characters were the white rednecks. But QT is white, so how can that be?
Must be ok then...
 
 
James
Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Header 1

Link 1
Link 2
Link 3