Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 25 Mar 1999 13:40:06 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Dr. Greenberg,
Three cheers for your points.
I find "craven" to be just the right word!
Sincerely,
Edward R. O'Neill
UCLA
At 07:00 PM 3/24/99 -0500, you wrote:
>i think it was his utter unregeneracy and a general slipperiness of
character
>
>re Sterling Hayden: he was deeply conflicted about testifying went to a
>psychotherapist who unbeknownst to him was a hireling of HUAC and or the FBI
>this piece of work persuaded him -- and several other characters -- that it
>would morally appropriate for them to name names as a result of his
>testimony, Hayden as I recall went into a very deep depression which nearly
>ruined his career years later he was haunted by the event mentioned it in
>his autobiography and evinced his hatred of what he had done and for the
>doctor
>
>I myself thought it was utterly inappropriate 1 for the award to be given
>and 2 for Kazan to have a standing ovation what a craven bunch
>hrgreenberg md endit
>
>----
>Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the
>University of Alabama: http://www.tcf.ua.edu
>
----
Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the
University of Alabama: http://www.tcf.ua.edu
|
|
|