SCREEN-L Archives

January 1996, Week 4


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mike Frank <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Thu, 18 Jan 1996 15:05:52 -0400
text/plain (26 lines)
in re: the claim that operas provide a paradigm against which oliver stone's
cinematic revisitings of history might be measured, please to observe that
opera composers for sure [and my guess is shakepeare as well] USED history as
the premise for military choruses and love duets [or engrossing drama and
flights of language] but were NOT concerned with revising history
stone surely IS concerned with revising history . . . his movies care as much
about what kenneth burke called the "psychology of information" as about the
"psychology of form," what we--in more innocent days--used to refer to as the
the conventional western is really the kind of film that does to [usa] history
what verdi did to [italian] history . . .
stone is doing something quite different . . .
. . . this is not to criticise stone's work at all, merely to point out what
standards ought to be applied if one wants to criticise it
mike frank
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]