SCREEN-L Archives

June 1996, Week 1


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Donald Larsson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 31 May 1996 09:15:45 -0600
text/plain (28 lines)
Quintin claims:
"It=B4s hard to imagine a literature
student saying: " This Madame Bovary is sexist bullshit. I abandoned it in
page 90.""
Well, actually, it's not hard at all.  Students have said exactly such things,
whether they are "literature" students in a general education course or
graduate literature majors.  The continuing periodization of literature courses
contributes to this: modernists will refuse to read Pope; Renaissance scholars
will give up on Pynchon; and so on.
A few years ago, one of our Master's degree students more or less refused to
answer a question on her comprehensive exam that dealt with Melville and
Hawthorne because of their sexist approach.  I could have handled a hearty
bashing of said authors in an answer but the refusal to speak or acknowledge
an object of study always bothers me, whether it's from the left or right.
But I suspect the problem applies to all sorts of artistic production--whether
film, literature, painting, sculpture, theater or whatever.
Don Larsson, Mankato State U (MN)
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]