You wrote:
>
 
>. . . it was the ideas i found reprehensible, not the spelling
>
>mike frank
 
I see Mike's point on this. . .I think he was reading the earlier post
with a sensibility perhaps too finely tuned to picking up
deconstructionist jargon and was wondering whether the words he was
encountering were sloppy spelling or, worse, some newly minted
gibberish posing as critical thinking.  I agree Mike might have come
down a bit hard, but his bullsh*t detector is at least in working
order.
 
Jeff Apfel
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]