SCREEN-L Archives

August 1995, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"m.broderick-student-hum-acacia-92098793" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Aug 1995 09:34:03 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
I too am running a bit late in responding to this thread, but my
understanding of Kubrick's decision to withdraw the film stemmed more from
repeated death threats against his family (by rightwing 'moral watchdogs')
and a long, spurious legal defence mounted by thugs to try and argue in
court cause-and-effect after watching the film and then going out and
beating people's heads in (in the UK and Australia, at least)
 
Mick Broderick
Universiy of Technology, Sydney
--------------------------------------
 
On Tue, 22 Aug 1995, C.Kay Weaver wrote:
 
> Sorry - I hadn't read all my mail before talking about the unavailability of
> Clockwork Orange in the UK, Tony Williams obvious has a handle on the
> facts, I guess
> my assumptions are the effect of almost being too young to remember
> anything other
> than a Tory government in the UK.  But it is interesting to find that a lot
> of us
> think the film *banned* rather than withdrawn by Kubrick himself.
>
> C. Kay Weaver
> Department of Film and Television Studies,
> University of Waikato
> Hamilton, New Zealand.
>
> ----
> To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
> in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]
>
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2