LISTSERV - LISTSERV.UA.EDU
SCREEN-L
Film and TV Studies Discussion List
Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
SCREEN-L Home SCREEN-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Re: Question about costs

Shawn Levy <[log in to unmask]>
Thu, 23 Jan 1997 17:04:04 -0800
text/plain (34 lines)
Show Text Part by Default | Print
As I understand it, there are actually a couple of things implied in the
phrases "above and below the line."
 
One is akin to billing (as in "The Name above the title") and can refer to
stars, directors or even screenwriters or department heads (cinematographer,
production designer, etc.); it's often used casually in this sense as a way
of implying that ther person to whom it applies has a prestigious enough
name to attract other talent or (more crucially, often) money to a project.
 
The other use of the term -- and the one you might be more intestested in --
distinguishes between negotiated and non-negotiated salaries.  For instance,
a star, director, etc. is 'above the line' because his or her salary isn't
set by a union; a gaffer or wardrobe assistant, on the other hand, is below
the line because his or her wages can be calculated in advance.
 
The Bottom Line, aside from being a wonderfully atmospheric old Greenwich
Village rock club, is another matter entirely....
 
 
Cheers,
 
 
SL
 
 
 
     Shawn Levy     | "Sympathy isn't what I'm after, I'm basically
                    |  almost happy, God in all His wisdom knows that at heart
 [log in to unmask]  I'm really not complaining...."
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]
Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Header 1

Link 1
Link 2
Link 3