Mark,
 
>Regarding the sexual inclination of slash books:
>I was reporting from an article in a Richmond magazine. I never made
>the judgement that since they were women, the MUST be lesbians. I said the
>authors in many cases ARE lesbians. Because they're lesbian, they must be
>women, eh? It seemed odd to me, too, but I relayed what info I had.
>Sorry-
>M o R
 
        I understand you were just reporting and I didn't mean to imply
it was your personal judgment. Sorry if it seemed that way.
 
        It's interesting that the person who responded to your note
(Elrod/Jeremiah?) reported contrary information. I don't know what
it means, but it's interesting. Isn't it? Hmm....perhaps only to me
8-)...
 
                        Sue