Mark, >Regarding the sexual inclination of slash books: >I was reporting from an article in a Richmond magazine. I never made >the judgement that since they were women, the MUST be lesbians. I said the >authors in many cases ARE lesbians. Because they're lesbian, they must be >women, eh? It seemed odd to me, too, but I relayed what info I had. >Sorry- >M o R I understand you were just reporting and I didn't mean to imply it was your personal judgment. Sorry if it seemed that way. It's interesting that the person who responded to your note (Elrod/Jeremiah?) reported contrary information. I don't know what it means, but it's interesting. Isn't it? Hmm....perhaps only to me 8-)... Sue