SCREEN-L Archives

January 2010, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:56:49 -0500
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Star/Celebrity studies
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
From:
Antje Ascheid <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
I still use star studies. To me there is a difference. Working on a  
star includes working on their films, whereas celebrities can be  
anyone. Hollywood still uses stars to star in their films....

Antje

________________________________________________________

Antje Ascheid
Associate Professor of Film Studies
Fine Arts Building
University of Georgia
Athens, GA 30602
(706) 542-2759



----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2