SCREEN-L Archives

June 2000, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Richard Davies <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Jun 2000 21:55:07 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Darryl Wiggers wrote:

> Oddly, it's films by Brian De
> Palma and Michael Cimino that stick out for me, and not too many people
> care about them.

Maybe because they are too often seen in video or tv versions , and not in
a cinema.
BLOW-OUT and SCARFACE make almost no sense unless seen 2.35.1. The sensual
aspect of filmmaking and watching has almost vanished, but De Palma, crazy
as he is, is a born visual artist, and therein lies the power of his movies
- when seen at the movies.

Richard Davies

----
Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
http://www.tcf.ua.edu/ScreenSite

ATOM RSS1 RSS2