SCREEN-L Archives

July 1995, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Michael Sime <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jul 1995 07:16:32 -0400
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
>>Sorry, a Postscript:  Why would anybody actually want NOT to learn or
know about, say, f stops or lighting or direction?  Aren't all of these
interesting, too?<<
 
Ok guys..now I gotta add my 2 bits....
 
Sure, there's the old addage "those that can, do, those that can't, teach"
But I'm sure that's not entirely true. I must agree with our Canadian friend
here though. How can you possibly empart a well-rounded instruction in film
(even if it is limited to theory) if you ignore some of the basic tennants of
the film making process?
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2