SCREEN-L Archives

April 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tony Williams <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Apr 1995 19:24:14 CDT
In-Reply-To:
note of 04/06/95 15:25
Comments:
Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
From: Tony Williams
English
SIUC
 No to the last question. But I find it hard to believe that Robert Zemeckis is
capable of the satirical nuances you find in the film - despite Dave Kehr's
amazingly apologetic article in the latest FILM COMMENT.
      Regards "Fellow Professor" or "Colleague" Tony Williams

ATOM RSS1 RSS2