SCREEN-L Archives

March 2001, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Film Art
From:
lgs <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Mar 2001 08:57:39 -0800
Content-type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Mime-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
It seems to me that this thread takes it for granted that film instructors
need a textbook. I wonder if this is true. Perhaps FILM ART is the only
vaguely workable textbook because their isn't a great need for such books.
They seem to be mostly labor saving devices used to cut down on time spent
developing a class. A few charts on handouts and some competent lectures can
accomplish the same thing.
Louis Schwartz
University of Iowa

----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2