SCREEN-L Archives

April 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: help with freud again
From:
Ed Haupt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 3 Apr 1993 13:36:38 EST
In-Reply-To:
Your message of Fri, 2 Apr 1993 12:46:07 -0500
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines) 
Unfortunately using neo-freudian for Lacan is likely to be misleading.
 
A psychologist hearing neo-freudian is likely to think of Eric Ericson,
Carl Jung, Eric Fromm, and lot's of others long before he thinks of
Lacan.
 
Good luck in finding specifically lacanesque critiques.
 
        Ed Haupt

ATOM RSS1 RSS2