Paul Wiener was right that Kazan would say nothing to undo any damage. This would seem to indicate he is unrepentent about naming names. My question is why he seems a particular target for hatred by leftist intellectual whereas, unless I have missed something, other "friendly witnesses" to the hearings like Sterling Hayden, Robert Rossen and Jerome Robbins (to name a few) seem rarely villified in print. Does anyone know if Kazan behaved considerably worse than some of the others? Mark Netter [log in to unmask] ---- To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]