>- The Star Trek crew is multicultural, bigendered and even interspecies. >Is there a member with a physical disability too - I haven't really been >watching for some years. Is the guy wearing a funny thing round his eyes >supposed to be blind? Was there any significance in gettng a British actor >to be leader of the new Enterprise crew (all the rest are Americans, aren't >they)? What happens with babies - do any of the Trekkies ever get pregnant >and if so, what do they do about it? And could anyone give me the correct >wording of the mission statement - 'to boldly go where no man/one ? has >been before'. Actually for a discussion like this, you'd be much better off with "Babylon 5" which not only has a broader range of characters (including at least one major gay character) but very explicitly deals with the problems of conflicting cultures, in fact that's probably the show's main theme. On "Star Trek: The Next Generation" the characters work together as a unit and are to a larger degree interchangable, as best indicated by a former enemy Klingon being a member of the crew. Cultural differences are mostly used for coloration and in the eternal Star Trek optimism are usually something that can be fairly easily resolved. (The original ST had even less difference, as does Voyager while Deep Space Nine has much more.) On "Babylon 5" these differences are actual differences, many times irreconcilable, other times they can only be worked out on a personal level. As for STTNG, Geordi is indeed "blind" though since the visor allows him to see I'm not sure how much of a handicap this should be considered. Captain Picard is indeed played by a British actor but the character is supposed to be French; again this makes no real difference in the show. There are in fact nurseries on board the Enterprise as seen in one of the recent movies (Generations I think) but the implications of this (or anything involving a long-term storyline) aren't really explored. It's interesting that Roddenberry and a significant number of fans insist that the Enterprise is not a military ship despite the military protocol, structure, behavior, training, etc; again it's that ST exploring the future outlook. And of course the point of military training is precisely to erase differences which is why ST has an "inclusive" family. >The Truman Show/Pleasantville - the way things used to be The Truman Show has widely been interpreted as how things are *now*, though I didn't see how it engages with any kind of reality, cultural or political. >Unit Two - The Black experience >Amistad >The Color Purple >Malcolm X >Do the Right Thing These films don't have any direct bearing on the "experience" of any black person that I know, none of whom were ever slaves, revolutionaries or rioters to the best of my knowledge. Perhaps, a Charles Burnett film like "To Sleep With Anger" or something like "Soul Food" might provide a better view. ------------------------------------------------ Lang Thompson http://www.tcf.ua.edu/wlt4 "Goethe once proposed that a museum of the inauthentic be created in Rome, in which plaster casts of all the antiquities that had been discovered could be displayed." - Moatti, Search for Ancient Rome ---- Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite http://www.tcf.ua.edu/ScreenSite