In message <l03010d00afff644ca28a@[130.132.159.47]>, gloria monti <[log in to unmask]> writes > > So, this becomes *Krin's* mistake. Interesting. It was also *my* >mistake, when I first subscribed to the list--in 1993. I don't think the >mistake is ours, BTW. I think that rather than >accomodating the needs of those "non-academically trained individual with >an interest in film" (in the words of Katie Hawks) who feel alienated by >theoryspeak, they should be redirected to another kind of film discussions, >such as Cinema-L. Is asking a question the same as feeling alienated? I was one of the ones who asked the question - I am a film scholar. Should I get myself fired? ;-) I don't think there was any suggestion that Deborah felt alienated by discussion in here, more that she enjoyed the challenge. -- Morgan "Nunc demum intellego," dixit Winnie ille Pu. "Stultus et delusus fui," dixit "et ursus sine ullo cerebro sum." ---- Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the University of Alabama.