Print

Print


>liz weis' coment:
>
> There is no definitive sound
> track.  The end product of a final
> mix (which wouldn't have happened in time
> for the trailer's first release)
> is not just one printmaster from which
> domestic exhibition prints are struck;
> effects, dialog and music are kept
> discrete to allow for release in different
> formats ranging from monaural
> optical 16 mm. tracks, to multi-channel
> digital systems, to foreign versions
> minus the dialog.
>
>suggests all too strongly that when it comes to film not only is there no such
>thing as an authoritative cut or "text" but that the whole notion of an
>authoritative text makes no sense whatsoever . . . i know i shouldn't but i
>still find this vaguely disturbing, even a touch sinister
>
>mike frank
>
 
In my opinion, Liz Weis' comment suggests no such thing.  It is a statement
of fact of which many people may be unaware.  In any case, without some
explanation of why Mike Frank finds it "sinister" to question the authority
of a text, his post contributes nothing to this discussion.
 
-Steve Anderson
 
----
To sign off SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]