a really interestiung question, not only for the specific answers it might elicit but because it foregrounds in a dramatic and visible way [pun very much intended] a major theoretical issue in cinematic [of visual] narration and focuses our attention on the apparent "reliability" of visal evidence . . . . . . i hope the answers and comments are kept public rather than addressed privately to lang thompson mike frank <[log in to unmask]> ---- To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]