Print

Print


i'm sorry to say i can't follow henry ersoz's reply to my attemot at
supporting the categories of diegetic and extra-diegetic (although now that i
realize his name is "henry" i can make a more fully informed guess about
certain of his biographical circumstances
 
i agree that the final scream in sabotuer is highly ambiguous  -- we find it
hard to tell if it's diegetic or not; and what status it might have eithin
either of thoise categories . . . my only point is that our own uncertainly
is a function of, and thus evidence of, the determinacy, stability, and
coherence of the categories themselves
 
hope this is a little clearer  (i hate not being able to revise these e-mail
texts for clarity)
 
mike frank   <[log in to unmask]>
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]