----------------------------Original message---------------------------- David Desser--your suggestion that tv is generally superior these days to film was picked up by the New York Times :> -- actually the February 14th article by Bernard Weinraub entirely agrees with your assessment and suggests various reasons why "in terms of dramatic value, relevance, and humor, prime-time television--much of it anyway --is far better than what's on at the movies." It's one a.m. and I'm too lazy to review the main points, but I've torn the article out;if you want me to send it by snail mail, you have a week before it gets tossed. Actually, the article isn't profound; it's mostly confirmation through interviews with major players in the tv industry. By the way I agree--there is much more good writing for tv these days than for film.--as someone in the article says, you can develop a character for 110 hours if a series is successful, rather than the 2 you get with a movie. liz weis, cuny