----------------------------Original message---------------------------- Duck Amuck (Warners 1950s, Dir: Chuck Jones, I think) is a great example of many references to the process of cinema and animation which suggests that these cartoons are made as much for adults as for kids (not that kids don't pick up on the references or jokes as well). This one involves Daffy Duck in a dialogue with the animator who keeps playing jokes on him by erasing the background to confuse Daffy's sense of the "role" he is playing. Daffy is continually re-drawn in different costumes etc and becomes increasingly frustrated, finally telling the animator "look bud, I'm doing my part..." The re-costuming is interesting also in Bugs Bunny. Whenever Bugs is in trouble he(?) dresses in drag as a disguise. The transvestite bunny seems to be imitating hollywood stars. These cartoons should be considered in light of feminist concerns of th"masquarade" and the assuming of masculine identity in spectatorship. There are a great deal of cartoons to consider in light of these issues. Darrell Varga York University Graduate Student [log in to unmask]