Just a thought on the premise that the majority of Americans know the concept of due process. If you have been keeping up with the OJ trial, you would see this is not the case. Recently, many jurorers were excused for their belief that you are "guilty until you prove your innocence" and they did not understand that the state had to produce evidence to prove w/o a reasonable doubt the accused's guilt. This, sadly, was not an isolated incident. Where did they get their concepts from? Gregg Weir @ Discovery.Co