>impose it themselves. For example, when choosing one item for a library over >another, you are exercising a form of censorship. That is not censorship. That's resource management. If I decide to go see movie A instead of movie B because I only have enough cash for one movie, is that censorship? No. It's making a decision based more on money than content - content only determines which film I'll see first. >sake. For example, I would not consider letting my four year old nephew watch >a horror movie because a)the certificate it probably carries denotes that it is >unsuitable for someone of his age and b) it would terrify him unnecessarily. I don't like to tell other people how to raise their kids. WHen I think of censorship, it is at the level of public institutions. I wouldn't want a librarian keeping that same movie from being carried at the library just because it might terrify folks unnecessarily. I think the "resource managemnent" part above comes into play here, though - I can think of many movies that should be carried by libraries before they take any "slasher" flicks ;) J Roberson