On Fri, 21 Oct 1994, Ian Noe wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 1994, Patrick B Bjork wrote: > > > Pardon me for asking but could you define the phrase "truly important > > filmmakers?" Or at least provide some descriptors to identify the truly > > important filmmaker. I ask because _Citizen Kane_, if I'm not > > mistaken, was also directed by an "untried and inexperienced" filmmaker > > which *over a relatively lengthy period of time* has been elevated to > > canonical status. Is it not inconceiveable that such could be the case > > with PF? > > Should read: Is it conceiveable that such could be the case with PF? > Answer: No. Well, then: It's settled! And so persuasively argued! Next.... ......sigh..... Why is it that people wanting to dismiss Tarantino are so convinced of their points of view that they don't feel a need to explain them? |"I'm a multi-faceted, talented, wealthy, Shawn Levy | internationally famous genius. I have an [log in to unmask] | IQ of over 190. People don't like that." | -- Jerry Lewis