On Thu, 20 Oct 1994, Patrick B Bjork wrote: > Pardon me for asking but could you define the phrase "truly important > filmmakers?" Or at least provide some descriptors to identify the truly > important filmmaker. I ask because _Citizen Kane_, if I'm not > mistaken, was also directed by an "untried and inexperienced" filmmaker > which *over a relatively lengthy period of time* has been elevated to > canonical status. Is it not inconceiveable that such could be the case > with PF? Should read: Is it conceiveable that such could be the case with PF? Answer: No.