> From a purely societal POV, we end up where we are now: a society > where everyone has "rights." EVERYONE has rights(except perhaps white > males)! Trouble is, when everyone has rights, then nobody has manners > anymore. The religious right is painted by the liberals to be a bunch of > controlling fruitcakes. Yet the religious right doesn't want to control > anyone, they just don't want others to force them to accept values they > don't believe in. When Patricia Ireland says that: "Any kind of sex with > a man is rape," you can understand how they feel. See what I mean? If > you don't agree that gays and lesbians should be able to adopt children > your branded a homophobe. There is no middle ground here, as there is no > middle ground in PC in general. When it starts to creep into my work, I > get real upset. The fact that your rethorical question only gave me two > options makes that clear to me. Its either this, or that. No other > option or even inbetween anymore. > ---------------->from John G. Thomas ([log in to unmask]) <------------------- Since you appear to be blaming all of the left-wing for your's and society's problems, I'm curious to know where your "inbetween" is? --Patrick