I have been monitoring the conversation regarding censorship/obscenity/ teaching practice, and have a few comments. Dr. Jenkins (sorry, Henry, it's a term of respect) has made many good points about teaching "sensitive" and potentially obscene materials (in the legal sense). However, I object to the mention made in other discussions to the University of Iowa policy on depictions of "human sexual acts." While I agree that the thought and consideration that Jenkins and others put into lesson plans is "good teaching," a problem arises in forming a policy about sexual, visual, and possibly explicit materials. It seems to me that if students object to class materials, the hue and cry is indicative of a larger problem than the presentation of the material. The incidents that have precipitated the discussion and policy at UI are not about depictions of "human sexual acts" (whatever those might be) but about political differences and conflicts among class members, the T.A. s included. Such conflicts should be handled through the established channels regarding student complaints. Instead of censuring the T.A. for presenting the materials, wouldn't it be more appropriate (in a setting of "higher" education) for a senior faculty member (read, advisor) to talk with the T.A. and perhaps the offended student(s), evaluate the situation, and then take appropriate measures? In this way, the T.A., the student, and even the advisor could all benefit from the situation. No additional policy would have to be formed, as complaints could be handled through the normal channels. Such an approach to this "problem" would not produce a chilling effect (which is now a reality at UI) and would increase understanding and communication. As my colleague R. Hurst has proposed in the last few days, this hullabaloo is a symptom of a larger problem, and should be treated as such. Conflicts about explicit materials can be an opportunity for learning and should not be silenced with a policy like the Iowa Regent's. As an update, the Iowa Board of Regents has rejected a compromise policy from the faculty senate. The policy still stands. Sharon Jones University of Iowa [log in to unmask]