>The point has already been made once today, in terms that were more polite >than one of this afternoon's messages merited: suggestions about the shape Wait a second, wait a second. This remark leads me to believe that my former message is the one alluded to her e. Which is to say that I was not polite? I meant no harm or rudeness in writ ing. I'm on here to learn what I can and to share what information I may have . It would be a waste of everyone's time if my intentions were otherwise. I'm not making an apology for my former message. I still think it was appopriate . I understand the value of others' ppinions, but I also think the library is a wonderful resource that is tooooften overlooked. I just wanted to point ou t that I didn't mean to be rude. None of you know me personally, but if you did yo u would know that I am as far from rude as possible. So I am upset to see tha t I have been misunderstood. I said before that it was a waste of time to write an ything other than interesting and useful things. This message is neither. Bu t for my own peace of mind, I wanted to clear this up. I don't want to be embarres ed to post on here, and I don't want to be written off when I do. Ok. I'm done. -Felicia p.s. apologies for typos. keyboard is insane.