* * I don't understand what you mean when you say a "CEO ... should not be * responsibel for the effects on the people who work for it." I think * you fail to see the point of the film. The ultimate responsibilty * of the corporation is to its workers. When a multinational corporation * grows so large that it can no longer fulfill the resoponsibility it * has to the workers and towns who have devoted their lives to it, then * it should be criticized. * Moore was not trying to place all of the blame on Roger Smith. Smith * only represented the patriarchal system of corporate management which * is capable of destroying its worker's lives and security. * Sarcasm. Sarcasm. Sarcasm. And I think Smith, as the head of the system Moore wanted to criticize, was intentionally made to bear the brunt of the blame for Flint's troubles. (That part not sarcasm) -- Mark Bunster | Hassan Chop! mersh is available! Survey Research Lab--VCU | cassettes, shirts, stickers, etc. Richmond, VA 23220 |You'll never see a fish head in an [log in to unmask] |Italian restaurant, drinking (804) ELK-O-COP |Cappucino with an Oriental woman.