I teach introductory filmmaking classes and build a critical component right into the syllabus i.e. they must participate in critiques of each other's work orally before I say a word about it; they have to write a 3 page critical evaluation of an appropriate film; and among all the techno mumbo-jumbo I strategically place units on alternative narrative, documentary of varying types and experimental film in which we examine the techniques and structures at work. This helps to get them out of the lock-step, classical narrative, David Lynch and MTV are the only visual styles mode--if you know what I mean. And I deliberately bring in examples of things that I know they'll hate, and make them explain why. (Kenneth Anger's SCORPIO RISING is always good for getting them riled up, as is Gorris' A QUESTION OF SILENCE (just because my classes are 90% young, white, males who haven't been exposed to much feminist thought). Being provocative seems to work better than being "PC" when it comes to getting them to examine their own work both thematically and structurally. And when absolutely necessary, I have a little performance piece I do about banal film ideas (basically anything involving dormitory rooms, bongs, graveyards, suicide, toilets, optical point of view shots, and their best friend. I have actually seen all of these combined in one film....) Do television students have these tendencies? Hope this helps. Carol Beck, Keene State College (way up north in New Hampshire...) (603) 358-2764