I think you are missing the point here. Whether Time printed a magazine with Bill Clinton or Howdy Doody doesn't give anyone the right to take this and misrepresent it to the American people. The first time I saw the ad, I was quite shocked that Time would be this politically one-sided. Does that make me a "guileless dunce?" I don't think so. I have followed this campaign throughout, and have kept up with most of the facts. And the fact here is, the Bush campaign misrepresented Time's cover to make it seem that Time and its parent company, Time-Warner, not only support the accusation that we can- not trust Bill Clinton, but also that it endorses the Bush campaign. I have never seen this, and if you can find where Time did in fact endorse President Bush, I will gladly take back what I said. And if it weren't such a big deal, then Time-Warner would have sat back and smiled at the millions of dollars of free advertising it recieved. It is a big deal to them, and it is a big deal to me. I support Clinton, I trust Clinton, and I believe, no matter what low methods the Bush campaign does in THIS election(The gov't silencing the man who supposedly sold pot to Dan Quayle), Clinton will be the next President. Hail to the Chief!! Think about it. Dan O'Neil ONEIDB@MOREKYPR