Print

Print


> Publicity stills were produced for the PURPOSE of reproduction and in fact
> despite disclaimers were rarely actually copyrighted.

It's my understanding that if the copyright isn't registered on these
photos, it would legally belong to the photographer and not to the studio.
Is this correct?

Scott

----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html