David Tetzlaff wrote: > the absurd rants of the [Leni Riefenstahl] apologists ("Until someone can > prove, beyond a doudt that she did know, I choose to believe her > statement") [...] at least have the excuse of being delusional. Because this sounds like name-calling to me ('delusional'), and because I believe that NONE of us is free of subjectivity (except for David?), what would happen if I called DAVID 'delusional'? Would he attempt to JUSTIFY his claim, instead of presenting it as a truism? Just wondering - Ken M. ---- Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite http://www.tcf.ua.edu/ScreenSite