on 5/18/02 10:56 PM, "Jessica Rosner <[log in to unmask]>" wrote: > Too Vague > You have to know the EXACT lengh of footage,what format of film and the > nature of the negative ( new, old, printed on lately, does it need to be wet > gated ? etc) could run from $200 to $5,000 ( ok that's extreme but I am just > trying to give an example). Actually, I am wondering what the process would cost for Maxi-Vision. But since they don't actually do that yet, I figured that the price for current format would be a good ballpark. on 5/19/02 4:07 AM, "Darryl Wiggers <[log in to unmask]>" wrote: > I would also suggest adding what format you want for the duplicate. Do you > want to strike a new print, duplicate onto video (vhs, beta-sp, digibeta), > etc.? Also -- and most important -- is this a film for which you have > ownership, or have authorization to duplicate? Duplication for wide release. Or relatively wide, anyways. Nothing like Spiderman, obviously. Brings up another good question that'll answer that one. If I wanted to distribute to arthouses in the US, what numbers am I looking at? on 5/19/02 2:40 PM, "Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>" wrote: > I'd say that Jessica's 'extreme' figure of $5,000 is in fact quite > conservative. Two real-life examples that we've recently had done: What do you think a Maxi-Vision duplicate would cost, then? Jamo +BIL ---- To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]