there is a lot of work that criticizes hitchcock's treatment of women -- from laura mulvey's inescapable essay through, most strikingly, tania modleski's hitchcock book but these do NOT criticize his status as auteur, and in effect, in finding in his films a coherent strain of misogyny, in a way support his claim to having created a coherent body of "artistic" films - though modleski's intro chapter frames this interestingly if i may, without immodesty, call some attention to my own work, i've given talks on ways in which hitchcock frequently sacrifices thematic coherence for impressive rhetorical effect, though these have not yet been finished and published . . i'd be happy to share some of these ideas if asked mike -----Original Message----- From: Film and TV Studies Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kendrick, Jim Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 11:09 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [SCREEN-L] Negative criticism on Alfred Hitchcock as an auteur Try looking up some of the original 1960 reviews of "Psycho." They were not at all kind, especially for a film that would later become canonized as one of the great masterpieces. Critics thought it was far too violent and in some senses simply depraved and that Hitchcock was wasting his talent on such material. Stanley Kauffman, for example, accused Hitchcock of shocking the audience "past horror-entertainment into resentment." Clearly he didn't watch the film with an actual audience. _________________ James Kendrick, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Dept. of Communication Studies Film and Digital Media Division Baylor University http://homepages.baylor.edu/james_kendrick ________________________________________ From: Film and TV Studies Discussion List [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Longworth [[log in to unmask]] Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 9:23 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: [SCREEN-L] Negative criticism on Alfred Hitchcock as an auteur Hi I'm an undergraduate student studying Cultural and Media Studies at the University of Newcastle, Australia. The reason I am writing is I have a major essay on Alfred Hitchcock as an auteur, and to make my essay more interesting I'd like to locate articles / books which criticise Hitchcock somewhat negatively. I've been directed to criticism from feminist scholars, but was wondering where else I should be looking, and if anyone could please recommend any articles where I may concentrate my study. Apart from the feminist angle, I know of a couple of articles written by Andrew Sarris who comments on Hitchcock's films not being taken seriously in the 1960s because they weren't considered serious films like what the European directors were making such as Antonioni and Bergmann. Other place I could go with my essay is for Hitchcock's use of violence in Frenzy - I actually find the strangle scenes today pretty disturbing, and I understand critical reception to the film's use of violence was mixed. I think Rope might have been criticised also from a moralistic point of view. There is also Hitchcock's attack on religion in his films, such as the Catholic church, in how he represents / shows nuns in Vertigo, which is the key film i'll be discussing in my paper. I hope someone might be able to recommend me to resources articles giving a negative criticism, or mixed criticism of Hitchcock, because mostly everyone says positive things about his films. I seek to make my essay a mixture of positive and negative criticisms. Thanks Peter ---- Learn to speak like a film/TV professor! Listen to the ScreenLex podcast: http://www.screenlex.org ---- To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask] ---- To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]