I hope this was intended as a parody of what a producer or a John Q. Public would think of his films. Scott Lang Thompson wrote: > >In a recent post, the remark is made by Daniel Humphrey that "I'm finding > >hardly anyone who'll actually defend his work anymore." Why does his work > >require defense at all? > > Well, his films are mostly humorless, superficial, psychologically > implausible and tedious. "Cries and Whispers" would be unintentionally > funny if only it was paced faster, "Persona" is just silly and the fact > that he was able to make and release his faith "trilogy" is proof in itself > that there's no God. And I don't remember a single car chase in any of his > movies. > > ------------------------------------------- > Adventures In Sound > http://wlt4.home.mindspring.com/adventures.htm > > Full Alert Film Review > http://wlt4.home.mindspring.com/fafr.htm > > Funhouse > http://wlt4.home.mindspring.com/funhouse.htm > > "Where Do You Want to Go Today" > Somewhere you can never take me! > > ---- > Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the > University of Alabama: http://www.tcf.ua.edu ---- Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the University of Alabama: http://www.tcf.ua.edu