SCREEN-L Archives

November 1999, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
paul wiener <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Nov 1999 11:20:56 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Oh yes? And what about Sharon in "Casino?"

At 11:11 AM 11/15/99 +0000, plath3 wrote:
>In response to Louis Rayner's question concerning the differences between
>90's femme fatales and those of the early noir period. let me suggest the
>following differences:
>
>1. Early femme fatales were concerned with traditional greed. Bridget
>O'Shaunessy of the MALTESE FALCON (1941) and the Lana Turner character in
>THE POSTMAN ALWAYS RINGS TWICE (1946) are examples. The Sharon Stone
>character in BASIC INSTINCT is more concerned with mind games than with
>money.
>
>2. Later femme fatales are better educated and wealthier than their
>predeccesors.
>
>In short, femme fatales, like most Americans, have enjoyed the benefits
>of the post-WWII prosperity.
>
>But the most striking thing about the two groups is that they rely on
>seduction to serve desctructive (to say nothing of illegal and/or
>immoral) ends. Whatever their time period, they are femme fatales and as
>such have to have certain basic characteristics.
>
>Peter Latham
>
>----
>To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
>in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]
>
>
Paul B. Wiener
Special Services Librarian
Melville Library
SUNY at Stony Brook, NY 11794
631/632-7253
fax: 631/632-7116
[log in to unmask]

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2