SCREEN-L Archives

November 1999, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Mon, 1 Nov 1999 23:52:00 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<004101bf24de$56e2b160$b2d2bfa8@preinstalled>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (18 lines)
> Formal interpretations merely strive to say how the elements of the text
> relate:  Dorothy's shoes are red because the film is organized by primary
> colors; her dress has blue, the road is yellow; only so many choices were
> available for primary colors; the witch being green is determined by her
> relation of opposition to the shoes blah blah blah.  But such
> interpretations are dry because they have no semantic dimension:  they are
> sheerly syntactic.


Are you sure?  The shoes weren't red in the book, nor was the witch
green...

;)

----
Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
http://www.tcf.ua.edu/ScreenSite

ATOM RSS1 RSS2