SCREEN-L Archives

September 1998, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Sep 1998 20:30:54 -0700
Reply-To:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization:
UCLA
From:
"Edward R. O'Neill" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Darryl Wiggers' quotes from Kubrick's interview brought a
film to mind:
 
> A: I believe Thackeray used Redmond Barry to tell his own story in a
> deliberately distorted way because it made it more interesting. Instead of
> the omniscient author, Thackeray used the imperfect observer, or perhaps it
> would be more accurate to say the dishonest observer, thus allowing the
> reader to judge for himself, with little difficulty, the probable truth in
> Redmond Barry's view of his life. This technique worked extremely well in
> the novel but, of course, in a film you have objective reality in front of
> you all the time, so the effect of Thackeray's first-person story-teller
> could not be repeated on the screen. It might have worked as comedy by the
> juxtaposition of Barry's version of the truth with the reality on the
> screen, but I don't think that BARRY LYNDON should have been done as a
> comedy.
 
Like the opening scene of _Signin' in the Rain_ perhaps?
 
Sincerely,
Edward R. O'Neill
General Education Program
UCLA
 
----
Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the
University of Alabama.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2