SCREEN-L Archives

January 1997, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kale Whorton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Jan 1997 22:32:10 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
At 12:02 AM -0600 on 1/9/97 Automatic digest processor wrote:
>Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 22:25:41 -0800
>From: Alex Lefcourt <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Evita's Aspect ratio
>
>Did anyone notice how wide Evota's aspect Ratio was? Was it 3:1? Do they
>make films that wide? I only ask because from my measurement using my
>fingers it was 3:1, but I always though 2.55:2 was the widest.
 
I'm pretty sure, well, 99% positive that it's only 2.35:1.
 
The only thing i can imagine that would have made it wider would have
something internal in the projection of the film.
 
When I saw the 10 minute reel they played at Cannes it was 2.35:1.
 
Kale
 
----
The Internet Movie Database http://us.imdb.com/ "My God! It's full of stars!"
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2