SCREEN-L Archives

October 1996, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Oct 1996 11:34:40 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
On Fri, 25 Oct 1996 15:28:13 -0400 susan crutchfield wrote:
 
> I wonder how much the films' color differences-- one in b/w and one
> in wonderful, evocative (and a lot of red) color--had to do with their
> different receptions.  Is it too essentializing to suggest that the b/w
 
I think the pink/red hue which is evident in most prints of P.T. in circulation
 today has more to do with Eastmancolor dye
fading than any authorial intention...
 
Leo
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2