Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 4 Oct 1996 13:39:09 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> that may help Patricia in constructing her programme, is how
> vital it is to flesh out such 'simple truths', developing them into
> graspable and understandable issues, rather than letting such
> material stand for itself: once the eye is caught, that's when the
> brain must be fired up for action!
>
I suppose it depends on who the audience is. Personally I prefer the
opposite approach, unpacking something that is complex, its much more
pleasurable, and my experience with showing things is that people are apt
to be satisfied with a simple explanation and a confirmation of their
prejudices, rather that imagine a different argument.
>
> (Cool name...what's it mean? I collect name meanings!)
>
Infinite. And I also think one of the authoresses of the Rig Veda was
called Shashwati. The Sanskrit root is Shashwat, and unlike other names
does not describe an attribute, but rahter a mathematical/philosophical
propostion.
Shashwati
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]
|
|
|