SCREEN-L Archives

August 1996, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pip Chodorov <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Aug 1996 19:37:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
>Concerning theory about time (and space) in cinema, what about Gilles
>Deleuze's L'image-mouvement (1983) and L'image-temps (1985)? Any comments?
>
>Meret Ernst
 
Deleuze's books are fascinating, well-written, and important contributions to
film theory. But they are not about time rhetoric. The two books serve more
to define a paradigm shift in film -- both historically in film-making and
also thinking about film -- a shift from fascination with a moving picture to
a picture that exists in time. It is a highly descriptive metaphorical work
that attempts to define the object-cinema and differentiate between different
types of cinemas. It is not textural analysis nor semiological nor
semiopragmatic analysis of film.
-Pip Chodorov
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2