SCREEN-L Archives

June 1996, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Lincoln - Fetching Pictures <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Jun 1996 18:10:45 GMT
Comments:
Organization:
Netcom Canada
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
On Mon, 3 Jun 1996 23:46:45 -0700, "Edward R. O'Neill"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 
>        A lovely exception to the critical lambasting of *Ishtar* was an
>opinion piece in the Sunday *New York Times* by Janet Maslin (if memory
>serves), in which she pointed out that the film cost the same to the
>spectator no matter how much was spent on it,
 
i once asked harlan ellison what he thought of the bruhaha surrounding
the budget of ishtar. he said "why should i care how much it cost?
it's not as if hollywood is gonna donate its underbudget monies to
cancer research or the homeless."
 
L.
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2