SCREEN-L Archives

February 1996, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rob Tregenza <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Feb 1996 22:52:19 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
One other thing to remember... the very early hand cranked cameras gave some
freedom to the operator to crank at different speeds. If they got excited...
I believe they cranked at bit faster... wouldn't you?
 
Second point... on the pull back up on any crank the speed would be faster...
ever use rewinds on a bench...? They attempted to keep the speed even but
there were no controls at that point that governed the speed... hence the
later need for spring drives and constant speed etc.
 
 I agree... this "new" system sound a bit strange. What you would really
need is a variable/non variable human to crank both
the projector and the camera during the transfer to video. Anybody talkin'
 to the Lumieres or Latham these days... they may have the answer?
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2